Pre-call brief · 30 July 2026

Curate Health

A GPhC-registered UK pharmacy running 67 live Meta ads — 23 unique creatives, one layout, and about seventy percent of them arguing the same point.

Tom Wallace · Co-founder curatehealth.co.uk GPhC 9012920 150,000+ patients Evidence pulled 29 Jul 2026

Who you're talking to

Tom Wallace, co-founder of Curate Health since July 2022. Before that he founded Vitamist (oral-spray supplements — Amazon, Boots, Revital, Lloyds), co-founded Monbelle (acquired), and held a shareholding in Vision Healthcare NV. So: a supplements-and-retail operator who has moved into regulated telehealth. He has sold a company and he has sold through Boots. He will not need the category explained to him.

That shapes the call. He knows distribution and he knows margin. What he is buying, if he buys, is creative throughput and a funnel layer he doesn't currently have — not education.

What the paid account actually looks like

Live ads

67

Active in GB, Meta Ad Library, 29 Jul

Unique creatives

23

By perceptual hash — the rest are duplicates across placements

Distinct layouts

1

Logo top-left, category pill top-right, headline, product, button bottom-left

Landing pages

2

61 of 67 ads route to /landing-1 or /landing-2

The headline finding isn't the ad count — it's that 23 creatives are 23 copy swaps inside one template. Same skeleton, same green, same weight of type, same button in the same corner. In a feed that reads as one ad shown twenty-three times.

Their live creative

Curate ad: Same treatment. Less every month. Do the maths.
Price“Same treatment. Less every month.”
Curate ad: Weight loss treatment that doesn't treat you like a cash machine
Price“…doesn't treat you like a cash machine”
Curate ad: If your pharmacy still hasn't messaged you back
Switching“If your pharmacy still hasn't messaged you back”
Curate ad: Lock your price today
Price“Lock your price today. Watch everyone else's climb.”

Four of the 23. Full set: ~/marcin-co-ceo/research/curate-health-active-full/

Angle concentration

Price / anti-markup~70%
Switching~15%
Daily-tablet launch~10%
Clinical authority~5%
First-person story0
Mechanism / biology0
Side-effect / fear reversal0
Creator / partner lane0

Price is a real angle and it is clearly working for them — it is not the problem. The problem is that it's the only angle, and price is the one axis where a competitor can undercut you on a Tuesday afternoon. There's no second thing holding the account up.

Worth noting: their own /weight-loss page opens with “Weight is shaped by your biology, health history and lifestyle — not willpower alone.” That's a mechanism angle, it's good, and not one ad uses it.

The funnel, end to end

1 · Ad

Green brand static. Price hook. “Learn more”.

2 · Dead click

/landing-1/age — a page that says “confirm you're 18 or over” and has one button. No verification. No persuasion.

3 · Lander

/landing-1 — BMI calculator, price table, testimonials, team, FAQ.

4 · Consult

5-minute questionnaire, clinician reviews within 48h.

Step 2 is the whole opportunity. Every pound of their paid traffic passes through a page that does nothing except collect a click. It's there for cover, and it's doing no selling.

Meanwhile they've built 47 articles at /health-hub across all five of their categories — genuinely decent SEO content — and zero paid traffic touches any of it. They already own the raw material for an editorial layer. They just never put it in the paid path.

Worth raising, carefully

A question for their compliance lead, not a legal opinion

UK CAP rule 12.12 bans advertising prescription-only medicines to the public. The ASA is running a joint enforcement sweep with the MHRA and the GPhC and has already actioned nine advertisers in this exact category. The published guidance specifically names, as breaches: discount codes and short-term promotional offers on POMs, limited-time urgency, POM-linked price claims, and “weight loss treatments” where the landing page implies a POM will be prescribed.

Their live ads currently carry WELCOME35 (in 98 of the ads I pulled), FBTR404, FBWP10, “£40 OFF SITEWIDE – Ends Soon 🔥”, “from £98”, “£3.13 a day” — and route to a page that names Mounjaro and Wegovy.

They're a registered pharmacy, so the GPhC can act on their registration, not just their ad account. Don't play lawyer. Ask how they're handling it — it shows you understand their world, and it makes the case for an editorial layer that can carry the argument without the ad having to do it.

What the competition is doing

 CurateVoyNuman
Lead anglePrice, ~70%“Not willpower, biology”“If needles stopped you starting”
Creator laneNone9+ named partner pages, incl. Coleen NolanNone visible
AdvertorialNoneFirst-person celebrity story pageNone visible
Lander splitOne family, no segmentationTOF / BOF × men / women / mumsPer treatment form
Lead proof4.8/5, 2,400+ reviews4.7/5, 20,918 reviews4.5/5, 30,000+ reviews
Risk reversalNoneLose 10% body weight or money backNone visible

Voy is the one to point at. They're running a structurally different game — nine creator handles posting paid partnership ads, a first-person celebrity advertorial as their single most-run destination, and landing pages split by funnel stage and audience. Curate is competing against that with one template and a price.

Something to put on the screen

Eight statics, built today. Deliberately on their own strongest angles — price, no-subscription, switching — using only numbers published on their own site and in their own ad copy. The point isn't new messaging. The point is that the same argument has eight different visual grammars available to it, and they're using one.

All eight are built to the UK rules: no drug names, no “GLP-1”, no pens or vials, no before-and-afters, no weight claims.

Receipt-style ad: The bill that doesn't creep
Receipt artifactTheir “no hidden fees” line, as an itemised bill
Sticky-note ad: £3.13 a day
Handwritten noteTheir own “£3.13 a day” line, made human
Text-thread ad: the whole pitch fits in one text thread
Text threadThe no-subscription objection, answered in six messages
Chart ad: the most boring chart in UK pharmacy
DataTheir “watch everyone else's climb” line, as one chart
Maths table ad: you said do the maths, so we did
LedgerAnswers their own “Do the maths” ad, literally
Pricing charter certificate ad
DocumentPrice transparency as a signed charter
Mock email ad stamped never sending
Mock emailThe price-rise email, stamped never sending
Two pharmacies comparison ad, one replied
ComparisonTheir switching angle, with the support gap made visible

Built from builds/curate-fable-v1/. Substitute display face (Outfit) stands in for their licensed F37 Ginger. No packaging rendered — we don't have their asset pack, and we don't invent product.

What to say

  1. Open with the count, not the critique. “You've got 67 ads live. They're 23 creatives, and they're one layout.” It's a fact, it's checkable, and it tells him in one sentence that you actually looked.
  2. Give him the price point as a strength first. The anti-markup angle is genuinely good and it's clearly carrying the account. The risk is that it's the only leg the table has — and it's the leg a competitor can kick.
  3. Point at the 18+ page. Every pound of paid traffic passes through a page that does no selling. That's the single highest-leverage thing on the table and it's a page they already control.
  4. Point at the health hub. 47 articles, five categories, zero paid traffic. They've already paid to write the raw material for an editorial layer and never put it in the funnel.
  5. Name Voy. Nine creator handles, a celebrity advertorial as their top destination, TOF/BOF and audience-split landers. That's what Curate is competing with, and it's a structural gap, not a budget one.
  6. Ask about the other four categories. Their CSS ships a full design system for men's health, HRT, hair and nutrition. All five categories are live on site. All the paid spend is on weight loss. Ask whether that's deliberate.
  7. Put the eight cards up last. Not as a pitch for a look — as proof of throughput. Same angles they already run, eight grammars, built in a day, compliant by construction.

Questions worth asking him

  • What's your blended CAC on weight loss right now, and where does it break?
  • How many net-new creatives are you shipping a week, and who makes them?
  • Is the 18+ interstitial a compliance requirement, or just how it got built?
  • Who owns compliance sign-off on ad copy — in-house, or the superintendent pharmacist?
  • Weight loss is all the spend. Is that a deliberate focus or a bandwidth ceiling?
  • What happened with the Shopify landing pages you retired — did the custom funnel beat them?